Sabtu, 17 Desember 2016

JOURNAL ANALYSIS

Journal is result of the research of researcher, this writing is some parapharing of journals international that conducted by the experts.
Paraphrase I
Thalayak Orade (2012) did her research at a secondary school in Udon Thani, Thailand. He conducted the research entitled: “Developing Speaking Skills Using Three Communicative Activities (Discussion, Problem-Solving, and Role-Playing).” The purpose of Thalayak’s research were to learn and contrast speaking skills of students, and to learn students’ attitude towards in teaching of English speaking. To find out both of objectives of study the researcher used three communicative activities (discussion, problem-solving, and role-playing).
This research used the sample and population consisted of 49 students at a secondary school in Udon Thani, Thailand, classified by high, medium, and low according to their abilities of English speaking proficiency level. In the introduction of study researcher said that “English teaching and learning have the goal of focusing students so that they are able to use English for communication and as a tool for furthering their studies.  In the process of teaching and learning, the four language skills (listening, speaking, reading, and writing) are simultaneously performed.” This means, learners execute that skills to increase their knowledge ability, like speaking performance that cannot be apart in daily communication. She is a Vietnamese, and he assumed that, in process teaching and learning of foreign language speak is the most necessary lesson skill for basic of students as the English students, certaintly speaking very hard to learn. “Normally, learners in an EFL context do not use the language in authentic situations. They possess inability in communicating appropriately and correctly.”
Researcher used both of qualitative and quantitative method in gathering the data. Data collecting through lesson plans, a test of English speaking ability was used as pretest and post-test, an attitude questionnaire, students’ Learning Log, a semi-structured interview, and  teacher journal. The data was gathered, the study done in the authentic classroom. Pretest used as a test of English speaking skill of students.three communicative activities used in speaking class with 49 students. And then, the researcher asked the students’ perception about the using of three communicative activies that did in speaking class. And many others the way to collect the data by researcher. Because the researcher used both of methods, he used differents way to explain his data in analized the data. The questionnaire analized by SPSS and the others data was drawn from result of the research. From finding of the research, using of three communicative approach (discussion, problem-solving, and role-playing), the students more able in speaking skills. This was showed in pre-test students get the score 60.80 and post-test 85.63.
In brief, the approach that researcher used can apply in teaching and learning process to help students increase their speaking proficiency. Some recomendations for the teachers Thalayak presented “Teacher should construct a variation of English speaking activities which motivate the students to learn. Communicative activities such as discussion, problem solving, and role-playing can be effected used in the language classroom in Thai context.”

Paraphrase II
Ni Putu Dwi Verayanti Utami is an Indonesian researcher, she did her research entitled: “Speaking Performance of The Students in SMPN I Kuta Utara.” Some keywords tha she used rubric, speaking, testing. The keywords use are to easy the researcher in the study. In the introduction of the study, there are many opinion of expert about rubric. For example, “As a tool in testing students’ performance, rubrics can teach as well as evaluate. In student-centered approach to assessment, rubrics have potential to help students develop a ‘vision of success’ as well as ‘make dependable judgment about the quality of their own work’. That is what Stiggins (2001) states. Stiggins also adds that using rubrics in testing students’ performance is able to clarify the standards of quality performance and to guide ongoing feedback about progress towards those standards. That is supported by Black and William (1998), Shepard (2000), Brookhart (2003), and Wiggins (1998).”
She expressed that, rubrics are the one way to convey the expectations for an assessment, and providing the focused of feedback during teaching process. In this study, researcher explain rubrics as a tool to grade in speaking test including what type of rubrics that is the most appropriate, and what criteria of language features in speaking that should be scored deeply. Researcher decided that, the aim of her study were to investigate the using of rubrics in assessing speaking and the reason of teacher used rubrics in scoring of speaking competence. The research was conducted in 2nd grade SMPN 1 Kuta Utara.
This research involves five students of 2nd grade as samples of the research. As technique of collecting data, the researcher use observation. She observed students of Literacy class, they told about their experiences to develope vocabulary lesson and acquisition. Some participants of the research state that, they can concentrate on speaking as they wishes. Althouhg, the teachers have their own standard and criteria in scoring the students. The data was collected from the observation and scoring of students. The researcher used mix methods, and she analyzed the data by using score and combination with description of descriptive paragraph. Because the title of the research was Speaking Performance of The Students in SMPN I Kuta Utara, the term explained only about speaking skill, defenition of rubrics, components of rubrics, and types of rubrics.
The reseacher providing some result and suggestion for the eaducators. Such as, for the using of rubrics in speaking scoring the guiders should evaluate the tasking learning first. This is aim for exploring or knowing the students ability to get the best achievment. As the conclusion, rubrics become one way to avoid difficulties in testing speaking skill of students. Because there many types of rubrics, the teachers can apply all the types but the analytic rubrics decided as the best one. Analityc rubrics existed with detail information all criteria in speaking that includes vocabulary, grammar, semantics, and phonology.

Paraphrase III
This research was conducted entitle “Teaching and Assessing Speaking Performance through Analytic Scoring Approach” by  Luu Trong Tuan (2012) a student at University for Natural Resources and Environment, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. His research focuses on investigating psycological factors to find out the solutions to overcome speaking problem. Some keywords that resercher used were speaking, analytic scoring approach, holistic scoring approach, EFL. The aim of the study “was to examine if the analytic scoring approach in teaching and assessment would be more effective for improving students’ speaking performance. The research also explored the students’ attitude towards the implementation of analytic scoring approach in speaking teaching and assessment.” There are some source that researcher used to support his explanation, it showed in background of study and literature review.  
He used quantitative method, pre-test, post-test, and questionnaire method to collect the data. Researcher took two groups of students for the subject of speaking course in their previous semester. In his treatment, he was inviting a female educator to teach students in two groups to avoid the bias of researcher, that she was 6 years in experiencing in teaching and learning. Questionnaire used for exploring students attitude about using analytic scoring method in process of learning. He find that, students in the analytic group enchanced their speaking performance better than students in the holistic group during the process of analytic teaching and assessment, it showed in summaries of research. As his conclusion, holistic scoring approach in teaching and assessing speaking skill not only have some benefit for the students speaking performance but also the weakness for the students’ process in learning styles.


Source:
Dradee, T. (2012). Developing Speaking Skills Using Three Communicative Activities (discussion, problem solving, and role playing) International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 533-535
Luu Trong Tuan. (2012). Teaching and Assessing Speaking Performance through Analytic Scoring Approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 673-679,
Ni Putu Dwi Verayanti Utami. Speaking Performance of The Students in Smpn i Kuta

Utara

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar